Blind Power

Someone was listening.

And some others were completely deaf.

You see, I called my congressman yesterday to tell him to vote no on the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008. Several other good citizens also called him to say the same thing.

He voted yes.

The bill was defeated anyway.

I listened to all the dire news reports from PBS, NPR, ABC, etc. Their language was peculiar. The talking heads blamed one party, then the other…then nattered on as to who was going to fix it. It was as though this whole victory (to them, defeat) was an inside job.

Never, ever, once did any journalist, commentatory, pundit, or pretty face mention that perhaps…

The people did not want it. They were the ones who defeated the Nationalist-Socialist takeover. They called, they faxed, they e-mailed, they waved signs, they screamed, “NO!”

In order for the media to admit it was the peoples’ “fault”, they would have to also admit that we were wrong, which then lends itself nicely to the Nationalist-Socialist agenda. The people couldn’t possibly know what they need. “WE” have to decide these Big Scary things for them. [Yeah…this situation is big and scary…though in ways that would strip power from Big Brothers and give it back to US.]

The good Doctor:

Advertisements

4 Responses to “Blind Power”


  1. 1 amberpeace September 30, 2008 at 1:52 pm

    Erm, I like the socialist agenda?

    And the New York times does, indeed, have an article on the fact that most American citizens were sceptical of the whole deal

    What we can learn from Sweden —> http://www.gmfus.org/publications/article.cfm?id=485

  2. 2 Anna September 30, 2008 at 2:31 pm

    In some ways I, too, am attracted to the Scandinavian and Swiss model. I could not see it working here, however, because we are 1.) too large in population and 2.) we do not have a consistent connective culture to maintain a socialist mindset. To construct a Socialist state out of the United States would be akin to making other certain Nationalist conglomerates of the last century. Lotsa propaganda and control of subversive elements. That can get awfully ugly.

    The closest descriptive term to what I would like to see is Distributism, like Belloc, Chesterton, and Schumacher. Individual property ownership, strong local economies and politics.

    ~Anna

  3. 3 amberpeace September 30, 2008 at 3:22 pm

    I agree with you on I think every single bit of that except individual property ownership. But I’m also picturing the communal settings I’ve lived in, and the fact that those are based off 1st centuray church-models. You can’t do that when you’re creating a living model for a multi-cultural, multi-religious setting.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s




September 2008
M T W T F S S
« Aug   Oct »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  

Tweet!

Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.

Quotes

"I can't say I don't believe in your God, but I don't believe He meant the world to be as it is." ~Nicholas Higgins. North and South.

"I wanted you to see what real courage is, instead of getting the idea that courage is a man with a gun in his hand. It's when you know you are licked before you begin but you begin anyway and you see it through no matter what." No idea where that last quote came from, but I like it!

Current Reads

Father Arseny

Blog Stats

  • 418,738 hits

%d bloggers like this: